Players took offense to the suggestion that gamers might not nonetheless totally perceive the advantages of NFTs.
NEWS
Nicolas Pouard, vice chairman at Ubisoft’s Strategic Innovations workplace, commented on the negative gamer feedback that Ubisoft received once introducing Quartz and Digits, in an associate interview with Finder. “It’s a reaction we have a tendency to area unit familiar with. i feel it’s nice as a result of it shows however engaged our players area unit and the way turned on they’re regarding their hobby and recreation generally. and searching at that, I feel it’s pacifying.”
In the interview, Pouard goes on to clarify that Quartz and Digits area unit is a “matter of non-public choice” for players WHO “at no point” are going to be forced to use them. In Pouard’s clarification of Ubisoft’s motivations, however, some readers clung on to at least one phrase he said: “I assume gamers aren’t getting what a digital secondary market will wake them.” the thought that players might not “get it for now” wasn’t taken terribly gently by the Twittersphere.
Below area unit some reactions from gamers to a Tweet by Kotaku, the favored computer game blog: Some users were either merely “not interested” or believe that there’s a lot of gain for the corporate itself, then for the gamers.
Related: a lot of proof game devs hate NFTs and crypto
There is conjointly sentiment around gamers having actual possession of not simply a skin or a weapon, but of characters and storylines. If players will become active contributors to a recreation scheme, then might it be attainable for them to possess possession over the games themselves? Ubisoft recently partnered with startup alphabetic character. im, which can offer a decentralized storage resolution for Ubisoft Quartz. The significant recreation plans to continue desegregation Digits into Quartz through 2022.
Leave a Reply